This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Calamine (mineral) is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The article currently claims calamine was discovered to be zinc carbonate and zinc silicate in "the late 18th century", then goes on to say this actually happened in the year 1803. Does this mean it was widely suspected for some decades but not proved until then? In any case, where are the sources? 64.60.100.162 (talk) 00:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes ... confusion. Anyway the Smithsonian ref says that Smithson in 1802 showed that calamine was not simply zinc oxide, but zinc carbonate mineral(s). The mineral smithsonite was later named for him in 1832. However, the silicate mineral hemimorphite was not identified until 1832 Mindat. So the sentence: During the late 18th century it was discovered that what had been thought to be one ore was actually two distinct minerals: seems to be unsupported and the 18th century would need to be changed to 19th century. However I don't see a ref for what was referred to prior to the recognition of hemimorphite. The Smithsonian ref simply states the Hauy called calamine zinc oxides. Kinda suspect that altho mineralogists recognized that calamine was more than one mineral in the early 1800s, miners reports likely continued to call secondary zinc ores calamine. Vsmith (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Changed to early 19th century based on cited Smithsonian ref. Vsmith (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply