Fair use rationale for Image:Firstruddministry.jpg edit

 

Image:Firstruddministry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image - Rudd Ministry v Howard Cabinet edit

I have replaced the image of the Howard Cabinet in the article, instead of the Rudd Ministry. While the Rudd photo is more contemporary, it doesn't depict the subject of the article (a Cabinet). Unlike (say) in NSW, at a Federal level the Ministry includes many Ministers who are not in Cabinet, so a full Ministry photo is incorrect in the context of this article.

Other views are welcome - let's discuss here before further changes. Euryalus (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cabinet minister images edit

Only 5 remain without an image now - if anyone knows any places where they could look, please do so. Timeshift (talk) 08:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Minister For Ageing edit

It says Nicola Roxon Is the minister for Health and Ageing. That is incorrect as Justine Elliot is the minister for AgeingWilliam.hall15 (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Both articles are right - Roxon is the senior Minister for both portfolios, and Elliott is her junior Minister with responsibility for Ageing only. Euryalus (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

House Leaders in the Cabinet edit

The positions of Leader of the House, Leader of the Government in the Senate, Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate, and Manager of Government Business in the Senate are mentioned along with ministries on the Cabinet page in the front matter of daily Hansard publications. Would anyone object if I add these to the article? -Rrius (talk) 01:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I should have mentioned more clearly that the holders of those legislative offices hold cabinet positions, and the leadership positions are listed with them. This is analogous to Shadow Cabinet of Australia and Cabinet of the United Kingdom. In the latter, the leaders in each house hold another office, Lord President of the Council or Lord Privy Seal, that puts them in Cabinet, and the house leadership is listed with it. -Rrius (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Location edit

I (and I assume most others) assumed that cabinet meets in Canberra, however I have read the former Prime Minister Keating state that Cabinet meets in Sydney (Philip St I recall). I am not sure if he was referring only to his cabinet or perhaps Howard's. If any one knows the location could they please add the information to the article.

Thank you. 203.214.97.198 (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Cabinet can meet anywhere. Rudd recently held a Cabinet meeting in Newcastle, and no doubt they've also been held in the Phillip St building. But the usual meeting place is in the Cabinet Room in Parliament House, Canberra. I'm not sure this would fit anywhere in the article, as it is not a function or defining characteristic of the Cabinet. Any other views? Euryalus (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agreed with Euryalus. Not noteable. Timeshift (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

House/Senate membership edit

What requirements are there for cabinet membership? Nowhere in this article is it stated that cabinet members must belong to the House of Representatives or the Senate. I know in Canada and the UK all or almost all cabinet members come from the lower house although unlike the UK and Canada, Australia's upper house is elected. I also note that about a third of the current cabinet are senators. Is this a common ratio?--Lairor (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is no rule on senators. About a third of parliamentarians are Senators (in accordance with Section 24) and it is not surprising that this ratio might apply to cabinet.--Grahame (talk) 07:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I know this question is years old, but this was my first question, too, after seeing a Senator in the current cabinet. Perhaps, it should be made more clear what the requirements are for cabinet membership. Maybe even just a single-sentence mention that a politician from either house is eligible for memembership in the cabinet. --Criticalthinker (talk) 16:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

New Cabinet edit

Now that JG has officially released her Cabinet for the next three years, should we go about re-hauling this or should we wait until they're officially sworn in on Monday/Tuesday? DanEdmonds (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think we should wait. The article should reflect what is, not what will be. -Rrius (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


The new Cabinet Titles are incorrect, a lot of them are the wrong titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.7.63.177 (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cabinet of Albania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Old and New Minister edit

# Old Minister New Minister Indonesian subtitles
1 Prime Minister Prime Minister Perdana Menteri
2 Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Perdana Menteri
Politic, Law, Defence and Security
3 Minister for Foreign Affairs Minister for Foreign Affairs Menteri Luar Negeri
4 Minister for Home Affairs Minister for Home Affairs Menteri Dalam Negeri
5 Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government Minister for Regional and Local Government Menteri Pemerintah Pusat dan Regional (Daerah)
6 Minister for Defence
Minister for Defence Materiel
Minister for Defence Science and Personnel
Minister for Defence Menteri Pertahanan
7 Minister for Justice Minister for Justice Menteri Kehakiman
8 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
Minister for Multicultural Affairs
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Menteri Imigrasi, Kewarganegaraan dan Multiras
9 Attorney-General Attorney-General Jaksa Agung
Economy and Business
10 Minister for Finance and Deregulation Minister for Finance Menteri Keuangan
11 Minister for Trade Minister for Trade and Industry Menteri Perdagangan dan Perindustrian
12 Minister for Infrastructure and Transport Minister for Infrastructure and Transport Menteri Infrastuktur dan Perhubungan
13 Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities Menteri Keberlanjutan, Lingkungan, Air, Penduduk dan Masyarakat
14 Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Menteri Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan
15 Minister for Resources and Energy Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy Menteri Sumber Daya Mineral dan Energi
16 Minister for the Arts Minister for Art and Culture Menteri Seni dan Budaya
17 Minister for Tourism
Minister for Small Business
Minister for Tourism and Small Business Menteri Pariwisata dan Usaha Kecil
18 Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Menteri Perubahan Iklim dan Efisiensi Energi
19 Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Menteri ??, Komunikasi dan Ekonomi Ditigal
Social
20 Minister for School Education, Early Childhood and Youth Minister for Education Menteri Pendidikan
21 Minister for Sport Minister for Youth and Sport Menteri Pemuda dan Olahraga
22 Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Minister for Innovation, Technology, Science and Research Menteri Inovasi, Teknologi, Sains dan Penelitian
23 Minister for Health and Ageing
Minister for Health
Minister for Indigenous Health
Minister for Health Menteri Kesehatan
24 Minister for Human Services Minister for Human and Social Services Menteri Layanan Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
25 Minister for Social Housing and Homelessness Minister for Social Housing and Labor Menteri Perumahan Sosial dan Tenaga Kerja
26 Minister for Veterans' Affairs Minister for Veterans' Affairs Menteri Veteran
27 Minister for Employment Participation and Childcare Minister for Employment Participation and Childcare Menteri Partisipasi Kerja dan Perawatan Anak
28 Minister for the Status of Women Minister for Gender Equality Menteri Kesetaraan Gender
29 Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs Menteri Keluarga, Perumahan, Layanan Komunitas dan Urusan Penduduk Asli
30 Minister for Indigenous Employment and Economic Development Minister for Indigenous Employment and Economic Development Menteri Pekerjaan Adat dan Pembangunan Ekonomi

Akuindo (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 Abbott's First Ministry edit

Hi all, I have this link for the new ministry: http://www.tonyabbott.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GSBK9YwgcQs%3d&tabid=86 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.130.37.85 (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cabinet of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vitally relevant Const. status; likeness to PM edit

Just edited the information regarding the status of Cabinet in the Constitution - it doesn't have any - to add a couple of words linking this Convention with the lack of Constitutional status of the Prime Minister. It is my opinion that providing the opening clause 'As with the Prime Minister,' to the beginning of the first sentence of that paragraph helps to clarify the Constitution's literal relationship with the Conventions, and Cabinet's literal status and its practical status by demonstrating that it shares its differential status with the most obvious and Conventionally-powerful non-Constitutional role in Australian Government; those who seek to better understand the difference in status between the Constitutional and Conventional can, using this additional information, use the far more voluminous (literally, ha ha!) volumes on the likened role to complement the relatively-little (more dense, more 'academic') material on this subject alone.

I can provide extra refs if needed (although current refs cover the additional information). I'm happy, also, to provide 'further reading' specific to the data I have added, and there should probably be an internal link placed on the PM, which I will do just now when I find which PM page is ours. Charlie Sanders (talk) 02:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Internal link to PM (hopefully) added. Further reading, and extra citations?, on the topic of Constitutional status vs Conventional status, now including broader material as per the addition of the similarity of status to the PM, can follow, if thought interesting, relevant, or complementary to current reading material. Let me know. :D Charlie Sanders (talk) 02:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply