Talk:Business acumen

This article appears to present a biased point of view by over-promoting Acumen Learning and its key investor, Ram Charan, while ignoring the perspective of other thought-leaders. If Acumen Learning is responsible for this article, there is a conflict of interest and Wikipedia should respond. At the very least, the link to Acumen Learning should be removed. Since this is a private company, the link is promotional and violates Wikipedia's code of condust.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Business acumen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923042408/http://www.shrm.org:80/TemplatesTools/Glossaries/BusinessTerms/Pages/b.aspx to http://www.shrm.org/TemplatesTools/Glossaries/BusinessTerms/Pages/b.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090623215033/http://www.clomedia.com:80/executive-briefings/2008/April/2175/index.php to http://www.clomedia.com/executive-briefings/2008/April/2175/index.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719105324/http://www.management-issues.com/2008/2/26/opinion/is-business-acumen-a-substitute-for-leadership.asp to http://www.management-issues.com/2008/2/26/opinion/is-business-acumen-a-substitute-for-leadership.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)