Talk:Bush flying

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Request for Wikify/Cleanup edit

Currently this article is neither a stub nor a full-blown article. It has links but no headings, and could be seen as very extended introduction. It should be divided into Sections with automated contents as appropriate. I shall leave this to other users to suggest as my recommendation was already reverted. Davidkinnen 22:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm the one who reverted your tag. Mostly I guess it's cuz I think of wikifying as formatting. Now I see what you're driving at — perhaps it's more appropriately represented by {{expand}}? I've thrown that up on the article now, is that ok? -Lommer | talk 17:03, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that Lommer, that more correctly identifies what's needing done. Thanks. I agree with the request to expand. Davidkinnen 09:14, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'd suggest that Bush Pilot be a separate article, eventually anyway; I think most people would search for that term, for one thing; maybe a List of Bush Pilots, given the history of these men/women....Skookum1 00:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bush flying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply