Talk:Buangkok MRT station/GA1

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Arconning in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ZKang123 Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Arconning: Responded.--ZKang123 (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@ZKang123 Just one more issue, the title of the artwork is "Water, Nature & Contemporary". The lead says "Water, Nature and the Contemporary" Arconning (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 06:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose and MoS

edit

Lead and infobox

edit
  • The station will also serve an upcoming integrated development Sengkang Grand Residencies and a future bus interchange., add commas after development and Residencies.
  • Civil Defence shelter, add comma at the end.
  • An Art-in-Transit artwork Water, Nature and the Contemporary by Vincent Leow is displayed at this station., An Art-in-Transit artwork by Vincent Leow, Water, Nature & Contemporary, is displayed at this station.

Constructions

edit
  • re-developed, remove hyphen.

Delay in opening

edit

White elephant incidents and station opening

edit

Details

edit

Artwork

edit

Images

edit
  • Images have proper licenses and are relevant to the article.

Refs

edit
  • I would suggest linking the references without links, though a source is a source. Pass.
  • Random source check: References 2, 15, and 30, are okay.
  • Reference 44 has moved to a new location. Information is not on the current website provided.
  • Earwig's fine, manual check same. Pass.

Misc

edit
  • No ongoing edit war, focused and broad information about the topic, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.