Talk:Broughton Astley

Sutton in the Elms

Quote: It is often assumed that Sutton in the Elms is part of Broughton Astley, when in fact it still is seperate and has it's own identity.

Sutton has its own separate identity, to be sure. Nevertheless it is, together with Primethorpe and Broughton proper, a constituent part of Broughton Astley parish -- as the inscription on the Millennium Stone in the centre of BA (i.e Primethorpe!) makes clear. -- Picapica 19:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

as so often happens this is due to the common misconception about the difference between parish - an area usually larger than one village - and the village (more than one in this case) that make up the parish. Also (the teacher in me!) its is separate not seperate and please not it's Peter Shearan 18:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

Is there any real reason for this Sutton-in-the-Elms village to be listed in a separate page from Broughton Astley? I feel that, given what I've read here about it being in Broughton Astley's parish, and that there is literally nothing in its page, it does not warrant its own page at this time. Comments? DeMatt (talk) 08:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree - unless there is more that can be written about it then it should be merged (the guidelines for this are at WP:UKCITIES) - a separate article is not needed unless there is more content. —Snigbrook 10:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Broughton Astley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091126055340/http://www.thomestcc.leics.sch.uk:80/extended-services-community to http://www.thomestcc.leics.sch.uk/extended-services-community
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724085350/http://broughtonastley.leicestershireparishcouncils.org/latestnews.html to http://broughtonastley.leicestershireparishcouncils.org/latestnews.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080924073934/http://www.orchardcofe.leics.sch.uk:80/contact/index.htm to http://www.orchardcofe.leics.sch.uk/contact/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521081447/http://www.hallbrook.leics.sch.uk:80/home/headteacher.htm to http://www.hallbrook.leics.sch.uk/home/headteacher.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125045930/http://www.design2printing.co.uk:80/advert_to_offer_south.php to http://www.design2printing.co.uk/advert_to_offer_south.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617181322/http://www.broughton-astley.org:80/ to http://broughton-astley.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314155808/http://www.mybroughtonastley.com:80/ to http://www.mybroughtonastley.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Broughton Astley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080924073934/http://www.orchardcofe.leics.sch.uk/contact/index.htm to http://www.orchardcofe.leics.sch.uk/contact/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521081447/http://www.hallbrook.leics.sch.uk/home/headteacher.htm to http://www.hallbrook.leics.sch.uk/home/headteacher.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125045930/http://www.design2printing.co.uk/advert_to_offer_south.php to http://www.design2printing.co.uk/advert_to_offer_south.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.broughton-astley.org/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mybroughtonastley.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)