Talk:Brother's Little Helper/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Queenieacoustic in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 19:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will review sometime today. Ruby2010 comment! 19:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Three refs need dates and access dates
Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Also with refs, add IGN, not ign.com. A few are missing producers all together.
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • The reception section should be in chronological order (opening sentence for instance should be preceded by earlier reviews, if there are any).
Couldn't find any earlier reviews, sadly. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • It could use another review or two. Also, it needs ratings data (always hard to find I know)
I found another review, which I'll add shortly, but that's about it. I also found out that a fictional word from the episode made it to a list of best created Simpsons words, but I'm not sure if that would pass as a "review," per se. I'll try to get my hands on some ratings info too. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • I might suggest realigning the Mark McGuire image to the left (just a personal preference so not everything is skewed right)
Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Wikilink Fox network, Major League Baseball, and Bart in lead
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "starts paying more attention to his studies" Add bolded
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Clinton was still in office at the time, so remove "former"
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • As always, identify how Meyer and Kirkland relate to show (staff writers? producers? etc)
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Sentences with direct quotes should end with direct citations
Fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 20:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! Not really sure if the article will pass to be honest (mostly because there are so few reviews of the episode, and the entire season as a whole), but I'll do my best! Queenieacoustic (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've added a couple of things now. What do you think? Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply