Talk:Britney/Brittany/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

It has been too long since I have given back and done a GA review. So, on first glance and read-through, the article obviously is not eligible for quick-failing, so the full review is to come soon. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Full review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Article is done very well in a similar manner to all the other Glee episodes (in their multitude) that have reached GA status. This has been a quick review, but after a few reads and a check of accuracy, references, and images, it is obvious to me that this article meets all GA criteria. So, a quick pass for this excellently done article. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 03:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   There were two or three sentences that I would have not worded the way they are; however, they are mostly from stylistic choice and certainly nothing to worry about in a GAN.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All statements and references check out

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Everything covered here that is appropriate

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image properly dolled-up with fair use rationale; two free licenses images, all captioned well.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: