Talk:British Library cyberattack

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rename to just "British Library cyberattack"? edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments3 people in discussion

If there were frequent, notable attacks on the library then having a qualifying date would make sense. But since this is the only notable hack, perhaps the page should be renamed to lose the year. Chumpih ^t 21:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done jengod (talk) 21:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK. It's customary to await some sort of wp:consensus, with a few pitching in with their opinions, or with some time passing. But then again, I'm not grumbling. Thanks. Chumpih ^t 22:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was erring on the side of "bold" and it seemed sensible and non-controversial. Efficiency! jengod (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll add my support to the renaming. Rupples (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wahey! Consensus! Chumpih ^t 22:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic