Talk:BridgeClimb Sydney

Untitled

Does this article exist for any reason other than to host promotional copy for the company? Slac speak up! 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

I don’t think so. I edited it so hopefully is better, but I’m honestly considering putting the article up for deletion. Theres way to many problems with it, and I don’t think its worth the trouble of solving them. Janlopi (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BridgeClimb Sydney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205025945/http://www.travelweekly.com.au:80/news/climbing-sydney8217s-iconic-harbour-bridge to http://www.travelweekly.com.au/news/climbing-sydney8217s-iconic-harbour-bridge
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029185330/http://backpackertradenews.com.au/bridgeclimb-launch-new-mandarin-climb-22243 to http://backpackertradenews.com.au/bridgeclimb-launch-new-mandarin-climb-22243
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205025945/http://www.travelweekly.com.au:80/news/climbing-sydney8217s-iconic-harbour-bridge to http://www.travelweekly.com.au/news/climbing-sydney8217s-iconic-harbour-bridge
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.etravelblackboard.us/showarticle.asp?id=97343

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Blatant conflict of interest / severe bias

I have noticed that some of the major contributions to this article are made by editors that either have a conflict of interest, or are severely biased towards promoting BridgeClimb Sydney (again, the latter of which would probably be attributed to a conflict on interest). This article sounds suspiciously similar to an advertisement and is far from eligible to be included in a neutral encyclopedia. Though Japser Deng has reverted a lot of these dubious edits, I am creating this talk section to further clarify what the issue is and give a chance for the COI editors in question to respond.

1) The article has far too much WP:PUFFERY, for example near the start, where it is stated that

The company guides guests on a unique and exciting adventure climb on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Harbour_Bridge with entertaining and educational commentary from expert Climb Leaders as well as breathtaking views of Sydney and the surrounds.

2) Some of the article's contributors, for example, Saryabc1998 and Andreagonzalezgraells (along with numerous other IP editors), continually add such WP:PUFFERY. If you look at their contributions, their only edits are on this article, possibly indicating a COI. I am also suspecting some form of sockpuppetry. Lankyliver🧠 (talk / contribs) 00:51, 11 August 2021 (UTC)