Talk:Brick Community Stadium/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Aaroncrick in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. The rules for GA reviews are stated at Good Article criteria. I've never before done a review but I imagine I'll be doing to review in the order: coverage; structure; detailed walk-through of sections (refs, prose, other details); images (after the text content is stable); lead (ditto). Feel free to respond to my comments under each one, and please sign each response, so that it's clear who said what.

When an issue is resolved, I'll mark it with   Done. If I think an issue remains unresolved after responses / changes by the editor(s), I'll mark it   Not done. Occasionally I decide one of my comments is off-target, and strike it out -- Aaroncrick (talk) 10:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Coverage

edit
edit

Verifiability

edit

Without even looking closely several claims are unsupported.

Lead

edit

Referencing Format

edit

  Done * Referencing needs to be changed to 'Notes' and the books need to be put into 'References'. Check out York Park to see what I mean. Also once you've done that the book ref in the article should be made shorter, as the would have already been listed in full in 'References'. Use this format <ref name="Ponting22">Richardson (2002), p. 22.</ref> Aaroncrick (talk) 11:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Look fine. Aaroncrick (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Other Comments

edit
  • Done, not just for seasons, but any range I found in the article. Also, note another major change to the Wigan Warriors section. Their last home game of the season was on Friday, if you want to check refs and stuff. GW(talk) 10:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks good. Will be passing the article. Well done. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply