This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This article seems biased and factually dubious, mainly concerning the "harmful toxins" found in competative types. I'm not used to editing wiki articles, so I'd appreciate an overview by someone more qualified.
- It's indeed rather dubious that fire hazards to all wooden constructions is not mentioned even just once in this article. The only time the word fire appears in the entire article is to complain about safety regulations obviously annoying the writer of the sentence or the source they used for it by acting like they would be holding Brettstapels back from showing their full grace and greatness. --2003:DA:CF10:7300:F01A:8744:F669:BA24 (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Etymology
editBrettstapel is a perfectly fine German word, but its verbal meaning should be explained in the article. A Stapel is a stack, whereas a Brett is a wooden board, plank, or shelf. A Brettstapel is, basically, a "stack of boards" or planks. --2003:DA:CF10:7300:F01A:8744:F669:BA24 (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)