Talk:Breach of confidence

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
WikiProject Law (Rated Stub-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have reverted this edit. If you think something can be saved and inserted using a proper format in the article, please feel free to do so. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spring Board Doctrine Terrapin Ltd v Builders Supply Co (Hays) Ltd [1967] RPC by Roxburgh J at 391 - 392 "That a person who has obtained information in confidence is not allowed to use it as a springboard for activities detrimental to the person made the confidential communication and spring board it remains even when all the features have been published or can be ascertained by actual inspection to any member of the public" Page 789 [15.30] Price, D., Bodkin, C., Arnold, B., & Adjei, P. Intellectual property: Commentary and materials (5th ed.). Pyrmont, NSW:Thomson Law Book Co [15.30] — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeatherU (talkcontribs) 06:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breach of confidence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]