Talk:Brattingsborg Castle

Latest comment: 10 years ago by RhinoMind in topic Regarding The Points Raised

This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (December 2013) edit

There is only one source available... A close reading of the article AND the source will reveal why. As the source is as reliable as can be, I dont think this is an issue at all. The information in the article is important for Denmark in the middle ages, for Archaeology in Denmark and the military history of Scandinavia. Post yu comments below (after reading!) RhinoMind (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article has an unclear citation style. (December 2013) edit

Be specific please. I the author cannot see what the problem is, so I cannot correct it either. Please explain yourself when making statements. RhinoMind (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Regarding The Points Raised edit

Hello. Basically the article is not that bad for a new article, however you used the reference list under the Notes, and your Note is in fact presented as a reference. There are also no references throughout the article although there is a reference down there, the thing is, it is not cited. the reflist shows only the cited references. Try to clean that up and cite references, even only through the single source you have, and place notes without using the reference button, because that would mix the notes with the references in the reflist. Hope this kind of helps. I can't contribute, because I have no knowledge of the matter whatsoever. --Tco03displays (talk) 01:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot. That was quite clear. I will look into it. RhinoMind (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply