This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (December 2013)Edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is only one source available... A close reading of the article AND the source will reveal why. As the source is as reliable as can be, I dont think this is an issue at all. The information in the article is important for Denmark in the middle ages, for Archaeology in Denmark and the military history of Scandinavia. Post yu comments below (after reading!) RhinoMind (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This article has an unclear citation style. (December 2013)Edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Be specific please. I the author cannot see what the problem is, so I cannot correct it either. Please explain yourself when making statements. RhinoMind (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. Basically the article is not that bad for a new article, however you used the reference list under the Notes, and your Note is in fact presented as a reference. There are also no references throughout the article although there is a reference down there, the thing is, it is not cited. the reflist shows only the cited references. Try to clean that up and cite references, even only through the single source you have, and place notes without using the reference button, because that would mix the notes with the references in the reflist. Hope this kind of helps. I can't contribute, because I have no knowledge of the matter whatsoever. --Tco03displays (talk) 01:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks a lot. That was quite clear. I will look into it. RhinoMind (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
