Talk:Boycott Workfare

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it in no way, shape or form, advertises this group. Let's analyze the text piece by piece: Boycott Workfare is a British campaign group that has opposed "workfare" policies in the United Kingdom. - No advertising there, just a dictionary description. The group's campaigning has been successful in making several companies and charities pull out of "workfare" because of negative PR. - No advertising here, either. Just the results of their protesting. No advertising to be found here. Move along. --Revolution1221 (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you; it was not promotional. It's also not notable, and I came close to speedy deleting it per WP:CSD#A7. I redirected it instead.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proclaiming them to be successful, attributing the results to them without sourcing that backs the claim up, yes, that sure looks promotional to me. -Nat Gertler (talk) 23:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I used to be member of this group, i left on bad terms and will be very unlikely to rejoin or have contact with them. I have joined wiki editors community, can we have discussion about the page, I do think it is important

Libraryloser (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic