Talk:Bookham, New South Wales

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Riverina and Southern Tablelands

edit

How can the Southern Tablelands be part of the Riverina Region? They are two totally different regions? I'm going to put Bookham under the Southern Tablelands region as Yass Valley Shire is strongly more associated with that region, rather than the Riverina. --Xcharliex89 (talk) 06:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just because it's within the Yass Valley Shire doesn't mean that it's not part of the Riverina. Bookham is more of a border region town/village where the South West Slopes, Riverina and the Southern Tablelands meet. Bidgee (talk) 07:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough, however, the way you have worded it - its awkward and seems to suggest to me that the Southern Tablelands is part of the Riverina Region - when they do not. They are considered different regions. The Tablelands is not a mini-region of the Riverina. I understand that the regions intersect in the locality of and around Bookham, however, I think it is also unfair to dismiss the Southern Tablelands template when ultimately the majority of the Yass Shire is within the Southern Tablelands. I've formally recognised both regions and included both templates of the different regions on this page. Cheers! --Xcharliex89 (talk) 11:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bookham, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply