Talk:Blue rinse

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 75.73.70.113 in topic Original research

Blue-rinse bomb edit

I removed "blue-rinse bomb" disambig. Perhaps, if absolutely necessary, a link to Artemis Fowl can be worked into the text, but you shouldn't have a disambig link to a page that doesn't exist (and which would probably be deleted as WP:NN if it did). FiggyBee 09:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also it makes no sense to mix real and fictional contexts like that. Just zis Guy you know? 10:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pic edit

Pics or GTFO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.80.35 (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Seeing blue edit

The ability to see blue decreases with age[1], so an older woman perceives her uncolored hair to have a yellow-tinge,

But wouldn't she see that her hair is the same color as a white thing or a blue thing? I mean, they can compare, can't they? --Error (talk) 23:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think comparing yourself to your memories of yourself is stronger than noticing the rest of the world's colors appear to be changing too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talkcontribs) 03:08, 22 May 2012‎ (UTC)Reply

Original research edit

To add to the previous comment: much of the article - reasons for using, reasons for decline, etc - appears to be original research made by synthesising material from sources that don't actually mention thiese conclusions. 86.172.141.170 (talk) 16:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

So? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talkcontribs) 03:08, 22 May 2012‎ (UTC)Reply