From VfD:
DictDef. Unless someone can really fill it out, then it should go - Ta bu shi da yu 10:10, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: It's a short-ish page to handle two terms that do not deserve articles on their own. In a case like this, a double dictdef seems preferrable to Qidditch: the bludger. Geogre 12:53, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I kind of agree with Geogre, but the first definition in particular desperately needs a rewrite. Exploding Boy 13:17, Jul 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Concur with EB- needs cleanup, but it's useful. Keep. -FZ 17:00, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Colloquialism could do with some further detail. --Gene_poole 23:14, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup, disambig and split, or simply keep and wait for improvement. Certainly no grounds for deletion. Jgm 02:57, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Move to Australian slang and redirect. The second definition is of no importance. --Ardonik 06:36, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. --Woggly 07:27, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
- merge the two articles, Bludge does not stand on its own. ping 03:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'd say merge the material for the Austrailian slang term into bludge, move the Potter stuff to Bludger (Harry Potter), and turn this page into a disambig between the two. Jgm 14:46, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with Jgm. Here it goes! --Banana04131 16:55, 9 October 2005 (UTC)