Talk:Bloomingburg, New York

Untitled

Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(^{Dime algo}_{or see my works}) 03:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Bloomingburg developement

Hi.

Id like to read here about the controversial 396- home Hasidic development in Bloomingburg, any volunteer? 38.117.192.219 (talk) 23:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I have some questions about the recent change to this article, under "Future", beyond the obvious grammatical errors of the entry. First, there are no citations provided by the author. Second, does this mean that construction is occurring right now in spite of ongoing law suits or that the construction is occurring because the suits have been settled? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment, and my answer for the first question about the grammatical errors, is that i invite anyone to fix it, well i tried my best..., and for the second question about what exactly is happening there, is my answer that i don't know, the only thing i know is that something is happening there and bloomingberg is going trough these days big changes and i'd like to read here more. Thanks a lot. 38.117.192.219 (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki is not the place for advertising a new development. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.246.34 (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Do not advertise the new development, please just write a brief overview of all the major recent changes to the Bloomenberg village. Such as the new village boundaries, new mayor, new trustees, new ZBA, new communities, and a summery of the fight between the Anti and pro Chestnut Ridge development. Thanks 47.23.102.118 (talk) 21:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bloomingburg, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129082905/http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF to http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)