Talk:Birks' law

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 84.146.217.76

Both the quoted values for the Birks' constant do not make sense dimensionally. Thasaidon (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, also the numbers seem wrong. Correct values seem to be in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 39, NO. 4,1992, they are typically around --2001:620:400:9:0:0:0:57 (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Also the reference 4 is not existing... --2001:620:400:9:0:0:0:57 (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I believe the fomula should be set with mathrm d:

--84.146.217.76 (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC) (SiB64)Reply