Talk:Bill Maynard/Archive 1
Marital status?
Clearly states in body of text that he is divorced from Tonia Benn but the little box top right says "up to present" for their marriage.78.148.193.97 (talk) 12:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bill Maynard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704040148/http://homepages.tesco.net/~autumnview/stockcar/magic.mp3 to http://homepages.tesco.net/~autumnview/stockcar/magic.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bill Maynard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131027090504/http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/BIG-INTERVIEW-60-years-Maynard-laugh-critics/story-19801055-detail/story.html to http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/BIG-INTERVIEW-60-years-Maynard-laugh-critics/story-19801055-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Death edit
His death is confirmed in multiple reliable sources (eg. here). Please unprotect User:Oshwah. Ollie231213 (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- I was quite rudely reverted without explanation and then the page was fully protected
against guidelines and procedures. Aiken D 12:11, 30 March 2018 (UTC)- (edit conflict) How exactly was "the page was fully protected against guidelines and procedures"? What guideline or procedure do you refer to that I violated? I fully protected the page because we take WP:BLP very seriously, and even more so when I see edits being made to the article stating that the person is now dead but without any references at all to back it up. That's a serious violation of Wikipedia's BLP policy and the repeated edits that continued to do so prompted the application of full protection. I apologize if my reversion came off as rude in any way - it was not my intention at all. Wikipedia has been the subject of media coverage and high internet trends and responses in the past where hoaxes have allowed us to update a BLP article in violation of this policy. It's definitely a problem that we really don't want to have happen again... I'm just asking for your understanding and that I have the responsibility of protecting the project from harm. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, and I'll be happy yo help you. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- I fully understand the need to be careful, but now long-term and good faith editors have given clear sources. The only edits made recently are about his death which is verifiable. So, please unprotect the page. Aiken D 12:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Aiken drum - You're correct with your response here. Since references have been found and the article updated, and the original reason to fully protect the article has been resolved, I've lowered the protection level on this article. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have stricken part of my comment above - see below too. Aiken D 12:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's all good, man. Like I said, I appreciate your understanding very much and I'm happy that you see that what I'm doing is with protecting the project in mind. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have stricken part of my comment above - see below too. Aiken D 12:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Aiken drum - You're correct with your response here. Since references have been found and the article updated, and the original reason to fully protect the article has been resolved, I've lowered the protection level on this article. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you. Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- I fully understand the need to be careful, but now long-term and good faith editors have given clear sources. The only edits made recently are about his death which is verifiable. So, please unprotect the page. Aiken D 12:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- The article has been updated by an admin editing through full protection. I’m not seeing why the page is fully protected? The only recent edits have been to say he has died, which is now confirmed. Aiken D 12:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) How exactly was "the page was fully protected against guidelines and procedures"? What guideline or procedure do you refer to that I violated? I fully protected the page because we take WP:BLP very seriously, and even more so when I see edits being made to the article stating that the person is now dead but without any references at all to back it up. That's a serious violation of Wikipedia's BLP policy and the repeated edits that continued to do so prompted the application of full protection. I apologize if my reversion came off as rude in any way - it was not my intention at all. Wikipedia has been the subject of media coverage and high internet trends and responses in the past where hoaxes have allowed us to update a BLP article in violation of this policy. It's definitely a problem that we really don't want to have happen again... I'm just asking for your understanding and that I have the responsibility of protecting the project from harm. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, and I'll be happy yo help you. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
I’ve reconsidered what I wrote and believe the article was protected in good faith, as the edits weren’t sourced. However, it’s clear that the changes made were accurate and that he has sadly died. So I’m not seeing why protection is still needed? Aiken D 12:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 March 2018 edit
 | This edit request to Bill Maynard has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add this obituary from The Guardian. It is the only source I have found that actually states an exact date of death (March 30) :
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/mar/30/bill-maynard-obituary 95.199.8.129 (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
