Talk:Bill Bradfield AM

Proposal to merge William A. Bradfield with Bill Bradfield AM

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to Merge Kyle^(talk) 05:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

---

Yes, I support this merge. I wrote the article "Bill Bradfield AM" yesterday because it was red-linked from the "Bradfield" dsambiguation page, which did not link to the "William A. Bradfield" page. In retrospect, I should have done a more thorough search: mea culpa. I have never been involved in a merge; what is the process, who approves it, and who does it? I am willing to do it, to fix my own mess, but don't know how... --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Merge, the merge is not controversial, so you can read up on the process at Wikipedia:Merging. I will close the comment period and let you do the heavy lifting. Its a simple process - and you get to make a new redirect page. -Kyle^(talk) 03:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.