Talk:Big Brother (American TV series)/GA1

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Initial Reason For Reassessment edit

This reassessment is because this article failed Good Article Nomination over 3 years ago and since has been improved significantly. --Joe Gazz84usertalkcontribsEditor Review 15:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Complete Reassessment edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    As in the To-do list may want to improve grammar in minor areas.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    As long as the facts are also in an episode where they can become verified they just need to be cited to be OK.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Article could expand in the sections of each season.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Major fix in focused section and MoS minor fixes. --Joe Gazz84usertalkcontribsEditor Review 16:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am working on fixing the issues in my sandbox, it may take some time for me to find all the necessary sources and fix MoS issues. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. When you are done, please tell me on my talkpage, I will then re-review the article.
I am still working on the article but due to real life events my progress has slowed. You can see my progress via my sandbox. I am revamping the article to be more in line with other good articles and featured articles of TV series. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 18:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Coming back to this, this is stale and still needs work,  Fail for now.  JoeGazz  ▲  23:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply