Talk:Bhūmi (Buddhism)

Headings

The section headings should be reviewed. Wikipedia policy is that only the first word and proper nouns should be capitalized. It's not clear to me that "bhumi" is a proper noun, as it is used in some places in the article starting with a lower case 'b'. Also, the MoS discourages headings from starting with an unnecessary "The". Could someone more familiar with the topic please review and correct? Yworo (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

"3^ See also Nargajuna's Precious Garland(Ratnavali; tr. Jeffrey Hopkins: The Precious Garland and the Song of the Four Mindfulnesses; London: George Allen & Unwin, 1974), verse 441." this verse does not mention the path of seeing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.54.18 (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC) not that i'm really disputing that some agree with that system but it's presented as pretty universal and i doubt it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.47.143 (talk) 13:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhūmi (Buddhism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150415052512/http://www.fjdh.cn/wumin/2013/04/165725224642.html to http://www.fjdh.cn/wumin/2013/04/165725224642.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Additional Bhumis

I feel that the changes made by User:Patrickwooldridge at 23:09, 9 April 2021 Diff is here [1]

"Various Vajrayana schools further analyze the 10th bhumi into 4 (sub)bhūmis (9+4=13 total)"

violated the intention of my edits and previous contributors and is incorrect as he did not look at the footnotes. I have reverted this change and added more content and citations to eliminate confusion. if anyone disagrees with the reversion please feel free to undo my changes.

Should this section be changed from "Additional Bhumis" to "Vajrayana Bhumis"? Since it is not strictly Mahayana should it be moved to a different page?

Should the original citation which is in chinese be removed? Not sure how helpful it is on an English page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogi7337 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)