Talk:Beulah, Victoria
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beulah, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829165508/http://www.yarriambiack.vic.gov.au/index.php?f_func=towns_beulah to http://www.yarriambiack.vic.gov.au/index.php?f_func=towns_beulah
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Nazi flag content removed
editHi all. I have removed the entire "Nazi flag" section from this article. This is as clear cut a case of WP:Wikipedia is not a newspaper as you are likely to ever see.
- News reports. Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting of announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information. Timely news subjects not suitable for Wikipedia may be suitable for our sister project Wikinews. Wikipedia is also not written in news style.
Before adding back, please demonstrate on this talk page how the "Nazi flag" is of enduring notability. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Bacondrum (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think a section was overkill but I do think it probably warrants mentioning: even the town's rally about it got more press coverage/public attention/taught more people that Beulah exists than the town's probably had in about the last decade. Not too bothered either way though. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- I tend to agree that some mention is warranted, it essentially put the place on the map. Such a tiny and remote town making national and international news is noteworthy - though I accept that the section was too detailed. Bacondrum (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think a section was overkill but I do think it probably warrants mentioning: even the town's rally about it got more press coverage/public attention/taught more people that Beulah exists than the town's probably had in about the last decade. Not too bothered either way though. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)