Talk:Bendis

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ficaia in topic Dating convention

Untitled edit

I removed this: 'Modern followers of the Goddess have revived a cult of Bendis.' due to a lack of citation and lack of clarity. Neopagan reconstructionists may well have attempted to do so somewhere (or eclectics may have put a distortion into the Goddess Movement), but the statement as presented is too vague to be meaningful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.63.0.36 (talk) 03:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

A {{fact}} tag may well be appropriate, but to take the view that a renovation of the Bendis cult is a "distortion" is clearly the expression of a non-neutral POV. I don't think it's too vague, though certainly it could use expansion. Tb (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dating convention edit

Looking at the article history, there's been mixed use of BC versus BCE dates on this article for years. First use of dates here used BC. Some subsequent editors used BCE dates for their additions, but they didn't change the old edits so the usage became inconsistent and there was thus no consensus change. In cleaning up the article I've changed all dates to BC accordingly. Ficaia (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply