Talk:Believe It (Meek Mill song)/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zmbro in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Got this one. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Overall looks nice and simple. Few comments:

  • No recording dates or genre(s)?
  • ""Believe It" received lukewarm reviews from music critics, who mostly praised Mill's performance. They were more mixed towards Rick Ross's appearance, while a few critics observed a lack of originality." would read better as ""Believe It" received lukewarm reviews from music critics. While Mill's performance was mostly praised, Rick Ross's appearance garnered a more mixed reception, while a few critics observed a lack of originality."
  • properly introduce Meek Mill here: "In 2010, Rick Ross signed Mill to his label"
  • I struggle to see how the "After Mill alleged...of the album" sentences relate to this specific song and not their collaborations in general
  • He shared the song on what? Social media?
  • "struggle and triumph on the song could be felt and are "plainly articulated"," → "struggle and triumph on the song are "plainly articulated" and could be felt,"
  • "the song further reached number 38 on the US Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, which it spent two weeks on" → "the song also spent two weeks on the US Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, reaching number 38."
  • References look solid, no complaints

Overall should be an easy pass. My only main concern is there's no info regarding genres or release dates? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply