Talk:Beliefnet
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Beliefnet. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Beliefnet at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Bias
editThis page reads more like a press release written by a long-time b'net member. Except for the cited press release all of the information about the site is probably personal research. JimCubb 21:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, but I do think that this would make a good article. I think it's salvagable and will add it to my "to do" list. Nightngle 15:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, a lot of the information has been lifted from the Beliefnet site. I'll work on it in the next few days and get rid of the plagiarism and find some outside sources for references. Roaming27 06:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
It is much better but still needs more work than I have time to give. JimCubb 04:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk page clean up
editI have cleaned up the talk page by removing all discussions pertaining to the topic (of which I am also guilty of), as opposed to discussions pertaining to the article. This page is to be used strictly for discussions on how to improve the Wikipedia article, not for general discussion of the topic. If you simply want to moan and groan about the topic, do it elsewhere; this is not the place for general discussion. I have also added the "forum" tag to dissuade those who may treat this as a forum in the future. I have also added two Wikiproject banners (one for religion and one for websites). Hopefully we can get a few more people coming from those projects to help out. --132 19:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)