Talk:Belarus in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2015

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belarus in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2015 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Belarus Low‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Volshebstvo edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Merge. Figure81 (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article fails WP:NSONGS. After what was discussed and the change to WP:NMG, it is better the article be merged in the proposed location. Wes Mouse ✒ 16:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge: I agree. If no one opposes the merge in a little while and you haven't merged it then I'll go ahead and merge it. Figure81 (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's fine with me Figure81, if you wish to carry out the action as a speedy merge. Wes Mouse ✒ 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cleanup edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I came by this article for the merge but found that multiple past merges have caused the article to need some rearranging. I've removed a ton of redundancy but there is still more to be removed. I am not sure if anyone else is watching the article other than me and Wesley, but hopefully I've made a good start. I might be back to do some more later, just ran out of time this morning is all. Figure81 (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic