Talk:Beatriz Michelena/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Miller17CU94 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Well-written
Factually accurate and verifiable
Neutral
  • No issues.
Stable
  • No issues.
Images
  • One image shown, but it is a valid one.
Overall
  • Hold. Needs work, but it can be done.

Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixes in progress, I struck through the ones that have been addressed. Binksternet (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay! I have thrown a lot more stuff at the article. It comes from running into better sources while trying to track down the dead links, etc. The article now has extensive quotes, more images, better account of post-film days, and her death; all from good new refs. One big change is that I put her marriage some time in 1906 based on two different newspaper articles from 1910—prior to me seeing those articles, I had little evidence regarding her marriage, just a vague sense of them meeting in 1913 and marrying soon afterward, as represented by Geoffrey Bell in his 1984 book and by reporter Jason Walsh in his 2008 newspaper article. Now it is obvious from the 1910 articles that Michelena knew Middleton quite well already by the time 1913 rolled around.
Anyway, the dead links are either yanked out or revived and the prose is massaged, so I believe it ready for re-review. Binksternet (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Good job. GA earned. Chris (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply