Talk:Battle of Setauket/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Magicpiano in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Diannaa (talk · contribs) 04:01, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The article is a bit short for a GA, but is well written and illustrated. I did spot checks of the sources and found no errors. Images are all properly licensed. --Good work. --Dianna (talk) 04:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review. I'd try to make the article longer, but I'm afraid it would lose focus if I did so. It's a relatively minor action without long-term consequences... Magic♪piano 19:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply