Talk:Battle of Arsuf/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HueSatLum (talk · contribs) 23:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

I will review. Some issues:

• More links are needed; entire sections are without links
• The lead is overall too short; per WP:LEADLENGTH, it should be "two or three paragraphs".
• I am not sure why "Sultan" links to Ayyubid dynasty.
• "Mt. Carmel" → "Mount Carmel"
• Add a {{convert}} for distances

Links: Items are in general only linked once in an article, the lower down an article you get the sparser are the links, as repetitions of terms and referents occur.

Lead: extended it to two paras.

Sultan: There is a difficulty here - you can talk of "King of England" but Saladin held Egypt and Syria in a sort of personal union, and there isn't a geographic or political entity called "Sultanate of Egypt and Syria" to refer to, just the dynasty. I have rearranged the sentence, it's a bit clunky but probably reasonable.

That's fine, I just wouldn't expect that to link there. HueSatLum 01:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Mt.: OK, done

Distances: No idea how to this, I'm just a writer and I'm a computer-phobe.

 Done HueSatLum 01:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Plenty of references.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers all aspects of the battle.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrally written.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Very stable.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are all free.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Quite well-written and informative. HueSatLum 01:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for your help. Urselius (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)