Talk:Barnes Milam/GA1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Gonzo fan2007 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 16:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


I will review. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Comments edit

  • I copyedited the article here. Let me know if you disagree with any edits.
  • The lead seems short, maybe add a sentence about his academic administrative career?
  • becoming head principal.[19] He retired at the end of 1971. maybe combine, like principal until he retired at the end of 1971.
  • Spot check: 4, 7, 9, 13, 17, 20
    • The non-newspaper articles need access-dates
    • Ref 7 and 17 needs "agency = Associated Press"
    • I archived the reference links.

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.