Talk:Baldwin (abbot of Bury St Edmunds)/GA2

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 


Lead

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • A pithy summary of the article.

Early life

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Clear and concise

Abbot

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • A pithy summary of Baldwin's time as Abbot.

After the Conquest

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • An interesting history; concise and well written.

Death and legacy

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • A good explanation of Baldwin promoting the cult of the Holy Face of Lucca, and the Cult of St Edmund.

Citations

edit
  • Noted

References

edit
  • Examined.


 


End Matter

edit

Is it is Broad in its coverage?

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • This article is a pithy account of the life and works of Baldwin as Abbot and Doctor to varia Kings. He protected Bury St Edmunds from diocesan bishops by leave / appeal to the Papacy.

More End Matter Stuff:

edit


  1. Is it stable?
  • Yes, very few edits to what is a complete account of Baldwin as Abbot. This page was created on 22 January 2016 and has received 86 edits since then.
  1. Top editors are
   * Ealdgyth
   * Ehrenkater
   * Srnec
   * Hugo999
  1. It is illustrated by images ?
  • No, however, search does not bring up images of Baldwin (abbot of Bury St Edmunds) - so, accepted.

Overall

edit

Conclusion

edit

  Passed