Talk:Bad girl art/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Bad girl art. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Quite Judgemental
If one reads the "Bad Girls and Good Girls" Section, it does not seem to me to stick to the ideal that Wikipedia has of being neutral. I can't quite explain it, but it seems to me the author was wishing to express a very feminist point of view. Dessydes
Balanced it out
I went over the article, toneing down the bias where i could. I also updated with the current revitalization of the genre. I read over it and i think we can now take down the "questionable neutrality" warning.
Sometimes...bad is bad
A bit more on the origins of this term would be illuminating. Who, for instance, coined the phrase "bad girl art" and how was it used in its earliest appearances? It's not insignificant that the term it is probably based on, "good girl art", originally meant "girl art" that was "good" and only later came to suggest something different. The ironic secondary meaning that this gives to "bad girl art" is worth pointing out, especially if anyone can show that this double-entendre was intentiional all along. I recall that there was quite a bit of commentary during the style's heyday, and much of it was disapproving. It would not at all surpise me to learn that the term has a "feminist" origin.
- I very much agree with the above comments. The thing that really gets me is, who are these feminist types really? There are women who are fans of WitchBlade and Lara Croft who admire what these characters achieve. Anyway, anybody who worships or condemns these characters should get a life. Art should be admired in it's own time and place. Dessydes
Jargon
The article uses "T&A" without explaining what it means. Is it meant to mean "tits 'n' ass"? Is this a comic industry term? Some explanation would be useful, rather than just throwing "T&A" randomly into the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.173.23.111 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 18 May 2006
Taarna
What about Taarna? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.69.44 (talk • contribs) 11:31, 13 January 2007
- The Taarakian?...have her washed and bound and then...bring her to me:)--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 19:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Contradicts good girl art article
The good girl article says that the definition does not refer to morality and that good girls may be evil or violent. By this definition, all bad girl art is good girl art, and the distinctions between bad girls and good girls described in this article aren't distinctions at all. Ken Arromdee 03:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The 'good' in 'good girl art' doesn't refer to the girl, but to the art itself.Dr Faustus AU 10:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- OK, but it's not up to us to define it, merely report on how it has been defined. I believe that the term "good girl art" was coined a few decades before "bad girl art". The latter term is a riff or reference to the former. This article needs to have reliable sources which show how the phrase has been used. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Darkness25 2.jpg
Image:Darkness25 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Angela hunter.jpg
Image:Angela hunter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
