Talk:Bacoside
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Concerning this dispute, the journal Drug Target Insights a) is not Medline-indexed, meaning it has not reached quality- and peer-review standards to be listed, a process under frequent review by the publishers of Medline, the US National Library of Medicine - under such exclusions, it does not meet WP:MEDSCI as a quality source; and b) one need only look at the low quality of studies described in the DTI article, i.e., low subject numbers, poor study designs, inconsistent herbal extracts used, and more, to see this is not a credible source for an encyclopedia. Walidou47 prefers reverting and edit warring over trying to understand source quality and to maintain a high standard for Wikipedia medical content. The user is POV-pushing to include dubious alternative medicine content and unusable sources according to WP:CITEWATCH under Alternative Medicine. Applying WP:BRD to bring the article discussion here for other editors to discuss and, if appropriate, support Walidou's position per WP:CON. --Zefr (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)