Talk:Backlash (2004)/GA1

GA Review

GA Review by S_RX

Lead

• Great wording, though I suggest adding a paragraph about the aftermath/background.

Background

• Why is sharpshooter not capitalized in the lead and it is in the BG? Remain consistent.
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• A third feud should be outlined to get a more overview background of the event.
  • Is that really necessary? There really weren't any other main feuds, nor any back-story to them. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Yes, I was told during one on my GA Reviews by an outside WP:PW member that 3 feuds should be outlined. For No Way Out (2004), I had trouble outlining the Mysterio/Guerrero feud, but I did the best I could for it. It doesn't matter if its not a main feud, an undercard match is fine to outline.S_RX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
      •  Done. –LAX 14:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Event

• Before the event went live on pay-per-view, Val Venis defeated Matt Hardy in a match taped for Sunday Night HEAT. - per WP:PW/MOS, HEAT should follow the same rule as iMPACT, and be in regular font format.
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• The third match of the event was Chris Jericho versus Christian and Trish Stratus in a Handicap match, in which Jericho defeated both Christian and Stratus. - Why is the result shown before hand, while other's aren't in that format.
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• The match ended when Victoria pinned Lita after an Inside Cradle after Lita got a near fall on Victoria. - the last part "after Lita got a near..." is redundant and not relevant in that sentence.
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• Cactus continued, as he poured gasoline on the bat and tried to light it on fire. - continued what?
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• Assaults by both men took effect, until Orton managed to pin Cactus after an RKO on a barbed wire baseball bat - the first part of the sentence doesn't flow with the rest of it, consider revising.
  •  Done. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• Edge, however, reversed assaults by Kane, who he then attempted to spear. - attempted "to spear"? remove "to" and reword it into saying that he performed a spear.
  • I have reword the proceeding sentence, which explains that Kane dodged the spear, causing Edge to spear the referee instead. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
    • That works fine.S_RX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Aftermath

• Written well, I saw no flaws other than jargon, but not to worry for now.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Per comments above.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Written very good; though a couple of prose issues, until they are addressed, the article is  On hold for the time being, good luck in improving the article.--S_RX 03:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok great work. Pass--S_RX 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)