Talk:Back to December/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Novice7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Novice7 | Talk 07:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Really good! Here are some issues:-

Lead

edit
  • Link country pop, singer-songwriter?   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • The song was written entirely.. — not "entirely", but "solely".   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Upon released as a promotional single — "Upon its release as a promotional single", would be better.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • although neither has confirmed nor denied these allegations — neither of whom?   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • The song was a "big" success in United States — try "The song was successful in 'the' United States.."   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "Swifts performed 'Back to December'" in a series.. — "Swift has performed.." typo "Swifts" → "Swift". And series? Remove "series of" and add some other word instead of series.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Background

edit
  • Back to December addresses a first for Swift, in that she had never apologized to someone in a song before. — reword.
I reworded it into ""Back to December" is an apology to a former lover in the form of a song, something that she has never done before"  Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "According to Swift, the lyrics were written as an apology to a former boyfriend, commenting.." — Split the sentence after comma.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Based in certain aspects of the song's lyrics, like the time line and some physical descriptions — I didn't get that.
Already reworded into : "Based from the lyrics, critics have speculated that ..."   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Maybe you should re-title it to "Background and release"   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Composition

edit
  • "the other song is Haunted" — change to 'the other being "Haunted".   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • You typed "apologize" here, but in Background it is "apologise". Be consistent.
I changed it and used "apologize".   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Lyrically, it is about somebody who was incredible to her, just perfect to her in a relationship, and she was really careless with him, so these are the words that she would say to him that he deserves to hear. — change that sentence.. Seems there are too much commas. Try splitting.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "the song's couplets" — needs a "writing" or "noting" after couplets.
I paraphrased the sentence.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception

edit
  • Roughstock gave the song four stars — out of how many stars?
Out of five.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • praised repeats. Try "complimented" or "lauded"   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Entertainment Weekly review was already mentioned in Composition. Remove that.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chart performance

edit
  • "number six on the Billboard Hot 100 due to of sales of" — due to "of"? Remove "of". Also, maybe "Billboard Hot 100 with sales of"?   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • A comma is needed after downloads on   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • In its sixth week, it has climbed to number forty-three — Maybe, "the song has since reached a position of number forty-three"?   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Internationally, the song "has" moderate success — "has"? Maybe "has had"   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • a "the" is needed before Canadian Hot 100   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Live performances

edit
  • Swift first performed "Back to December" on October 18, 2010, in Paris at a showcase — rearrange . First venue, then date.   Done
  • "set to release on the October.." — "set for release on October.."   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Next sentence also same as first. First event, then details. Like, "Swift performed the song on (the event's name), (details like what is it), which was streamed...   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Swift also performed Back to December on several occasions. — "on several other occasions".   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "as B+ in the Los Angeles Times" — "a B+ by the Los Angeles Times". Also, not "noted", but "noting"   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Is it a mashup or a medley?
My mistake. It's a medley, not a mashup. Already fixed.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Same with LA Times.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "Following promotion" — remove that. And, change to "Swift also performed"   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Track listing

edit
  • The EU track list is a duplicate of the US. Remove that.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Charts

edit

Good

Release history

edit

Good

Media

edit
  • Why don't you link a sample?
I already uploaded 34 second sample of the song and added it in the article.   Done MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
No... Reduce its length. Maximum for Back to December is 30 seconds (per WP:SAMPLE). Novice7 | Talk 12:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Fixed. I shortened it to 22 seconds.   DoneMyDecember (talk) 13:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
  • No DAB
  • No Dead Link