This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I disagree with the recent move. The current title has been used only once in a reliable source; the species is more commonly mentioned under the scientific name. See WT:MAMMAL#Common names and User:Ucucha/Titles for more discussion on the topic. In addition, this one source capitalized the common name; thus, the use of a sentence-case title could even be considered as original research. Ucucha 17:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
