Talk:Babcock & Brown

Assessment completed for Babcock & Brown

As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: content is of mid level importance but only written to stub quality (lack of internal referencing does not allow the reader an opportunity to capitalise on that importance

However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.

ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS ^talk 08:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Surely SMH not MMH?

Surely Sydney Morning Herald, not Melbourne Morning Herald? Tabletop (talk) 01:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Babcock & Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0%2C28124%2C24597424-643%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090317221343/http://www.babcockbrownair.com/layouts/54/uploads/files/9090.pdf to http://www.babcockbrownair.com/layouts/54/uploads/files/9090.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Babcock & Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080615010858/http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0%2C23636%2C23851655-31037%2C00.html to http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0%2C23636%2C23851655-31037%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)