Talk:BINA48

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2600:100A:B02A:DAFD:DD68:D976:2593:86DE in topic Is this for real?

Is this for real? edit

This article doesn't seem like a valid wikipedia article, rather it appears to be written as someone's project. Quotes like "has variously been called the world's most sentient robot" and referring to the robot as "she" are hardly taking a neutral point of view on the subject. Does anyone know more about this? Soupisgoodfood (talk) 04:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article states that BINA48 runs at 48 exaflops and was released in 2010. Tianhe-2 runs at 33.86 petaflops, and was considered the world's fastest supercomputer in June 2013. It seems like BINA48 is a thought experiment for a mock-trial about disconnecting a sentient machine. It might be a good idea to mention that somewhere, but I don't know of a source that directly verifies my suspicions 2607:EA00:104:2400:D938:407C:F9BE:8D8D (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

This article appears to have been completely written by username Lori Rhodes. Lori Rhodes is also, according to http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2608254/Life-purposeful-death-optional-God-technological-love-essential-The-new-tech-inspired-religion-uses-mindfiles-satellites-store-soul-future-revival.html, one of the people who runs Terasem Movement, the group behind Bina48. Clearly, there needs to be something about Bina48 on wikipedia, as it does have news coverage, but this isn't it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.40.152.40 (talk) 02:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This article has many of the same issues Sophia (robot) did early on, specifically describing the robot from the perspective of its creators' promotional materials and press releases as opposed to one more aligned with the current state of the art of chatbot software. This includes implicitly referring to the robot as a living being, referring to it as "her" as mentioned earlier (also note the article inconsistently uses both "it" and "her"), and generally skimming over the major limitations of the robot such that the average reader would assume it is far more capable than it actually could be. 2600:100A:B02A:DAFD:DD68:D976:2593:86DE (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Martine Rothblatt's wife Beverlee "Bina Aspen" Prator - source edit

A connected contributor, RothRep, has reverted for no legitimate reason and deleted valid source(s). RothRep deleted that Bina's real name is Beverlee (see source below), and IP 66.151.103.11 has done the same thing.

12.30.109.2 (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Edit: As of September 24, they have had the name changed on the gettyimages.com website from "Beverlee Prator" (the real name that was published on September 09) to "Bina Rothblatt". 12.30.109.2 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Video of BINA48 at 4:04 edit

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/life-after-life-trangender-ceo-martine-rothblatt-builds-robot-bina48-mind-clone/ -12.30.109.2 (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BINA48. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BINA48. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criticism section edit

The criticisms should be merged into the main text. Wikipedia style is to not have a section to dump all the bad things said about the article's subject. Ashmoo (talk) 09:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply