Talk:Ayla (Chrono Trigger)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Who is Michael P Williams. I see he wrote books in the past but I don't know if he's credibly or note-worthy. He's the only source I'm not sure about.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I'll be reviewing this article. This one shouldn't take long.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

The source is more uplifted through the publisher, Boss Fight Books, rather than Williams himself. Basically as though he wrote for IGN or Polygon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Here is some clarifying information about BFB: [1] - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Ok. in that case, it does seem like a note-worthy mention. I'll give it a pass now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)