Talk:Epidemiology of autism

(Redirected from Talk:Autism (incidence))
Latest comment: 20 days ago by 94.134.213.95 in topic Environmental Chemical Exposure is misleading

Wiki Education assignment: Epidemiology ENPH 450

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2022 and 17 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Holnesjc5773 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Hannatol01.

— Assignment last updated by Schmidtj5997 (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Where is the Australian/NZ prevalence / incidence data?

edit

One section (Hong Kong I think) refers to having similar rates as Australia but there is nowhere that actually talks about the Australian data 159.196.43.163 (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Brain Tips

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Llj2 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Llj2 (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Canada- updated Montreal Study information?

edit

I updated the data on Canada under Frequency Estimates, but as for the part about the 2004 Montreal Children's Hospital study, is there any updated information equivalent to this from there or should this be omitted as it does not flow with the statistics right before it referencing 2019? Llj2 (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Environmental Chemical Exposure is misleading

edit

The chemical structure of thimerosal is used to represent the mercury containing compounds discussed in the cited literature. I read both and it is most likely incorrect, the papers clearly state examples of sources like heavy metals (probably elemental or ethyl/methyl mercury), air pollution or dental amalgam which would not contain this compound. However, disproven theories about vaccines causing autism generally center around arguments like this, where thimerosal is used as a preservative. Not sure if its better to remove this section since in its current state its largely uninformative or wait for someone to rewrite since it is an active and interesting area of research? (Im personally not knowledgeable about his field I'm a chemist, which is why the structure stood out as suspicious) 94.134.213.95 (talk) 23:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply