Talk:Astrid Kirchherr/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

Notified: User:Andreasegde, User:Vera, Chuck & Dave, User:John Cardinal, WP:WikiProject The Beatles, WP:Wikiproject Germany

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • ref #8 [1] is dead; ref #9 [2] is dead

Done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)  Done

1. b (citations to reliable sources):

   • ref #34 & ref #44 are geocities sites, not RS. ref #35 is not an RS. I have fixed some other broken links and found one better source. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)  Done

   c (OR):

2. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • tagged and fair use rationales

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • On hold wilst referencing is fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)  Done

   All done, good work - keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, I'll do it after Magic Alex is done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

I have gone through this with a fine toothcomb, and have cleaned, formatted and deleted.--andreasegde (talk) 12:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)