Talk:Astley, Greater Manchester/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 21:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC) (Cake and wine tomorrow). Pyrotec (talk) 21:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced, but two web-links to "local authorities" appeared to be broken at the time of ther review.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated. Most of the pictures seem to have been taken by the nominator.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

A fine article and pictures. I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on your work.

After a bit of well-deserved cake, there are a couple of web-references that appear to need fixing: Ref 76 (Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue, http://www.manchesterfire.gov.uk/my-area/wigan.aspx, retrieved 2010-05-24) and ref 33 (Greater Manchester County Record Office, 2009-08-15, http://www.gmcro.co.uk/guides/gazette/gazframe.htm, retrieved 2009-08-15). Pyrotec (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)