Talk:Association of Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed

Article on Information World Review

I know nothing about this company, but I just thought I'd note that they wrote their own entry. Check out this article for more information. As long as the article is balanced, this should be no issue. But someone with familiarity in the field might want to take a look. —Amcaja 14:15, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

This article reads like advertizing copy. It should be on the PCG's personal website, not Wikipedia. WP:ISNOT a soapbox or a personal webhost. --causa sui ^talk 21:33, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree, but I don't think we should delete it either—it just needs to be pared down and cleaned up. --Delirium 22:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Google says this group is notable enough. Apparently they got some press attention, so there should be no problem regarding the Original Research policy. bogdan | ^Talk 23:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Actually PCG is (was) pretty important and put up a good fight against the UK government Blairite junta at the time of their introduction of IR35 and nearly succeeded in derailing it altogether. On those grounds alone and with a bit of editing this article should be allowed to stand. Sjc 09:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

No one is trying to get the article deleted, don't worry. I would just prefer that the article was less adulatory, and had a more neutral tone. --causa sui ^talk 19:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

I am an ex-member of this group. It certainly does read like copy, and has no real critique. I will add some details to rebalance this hype. TMYNS 12:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but how does this page differ in any way from any of the dozens of other pages found under the "British professional bodies" link? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.218.8.48 (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the deletion template as I've added some references. I'll go through the article in more detail and put more in soon. Hardale (talk) 10:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Association of Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.ipse.co.uk/about-us/history,
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140905123224/http://www.ipse.co.uk:80/news/2014/pcg-evolves-become-ipse-uk%E2%80%99s-new-association-self-employed-professionals to http://www.ipse.co.uk/news/2014/pcg-evolves-become-ipse-uk%E2%80%99s-new-association-self-employed-professionals
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080607124146/http://www.accountancyage.com:80/accountancyage/news/2218472/crucial-ir35-appeal-hits-court to http://www.accountancyage.com/accountancyage/news/2218472/crucial-ir35-appeal-hits-court
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bytestart.co.uk/content/taxlegal/9_14/arctic-systems-lords-win.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705175503/http://www.familybusinesstax.com/ to http://www.familybusinesstax.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100331202957/http://ictabuse.org.uk:80/ to http://www.ictabuse.org.uk/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.ipse.co.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/ABOUT_US/articles_and_memorandum_of_association/Rules_for_IPSE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)