This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just in case anyone is wondering why there are 21 sources in an article this short - information about the group tends to take up 2 paragraphs of a 9 paragraph article. Seeing as they've been around for 20+ years, lot of the information overlaps (lovely for verifiability but...) - so each sources refers to a single notable thing. There could've been 40 references, but I thought one for each fact was enough to ensure proof of notability and veracity of statements. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply