Talk:Aruba at the 1996 Summer Olympics/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Shall review this one. MWright96 (talk) 06:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Background

edit
  • "The Aruban Olympic Committee was recognized by" - recognised

Tables

edit
  • As ever, the data tables could do with the addition of the "scope=col" field to improve accessibility per MOS:DTT

Athletics

edit
  • "he took part in the first round of the men's 200 meters," - metres

Cycling

edit
  • "he took part in the 221.85 kilometers (137.85 miles)" - the convert template is required for the distance of the men's road race and the adj=on field is needed in this instance
  • "The gold emdal was won" - typo; should be medal

Weightlifting

edit
  • "Faro took part in the Men's under 76 kg competition" - decapitalize Men's
  • "recording a mark for this phase of the competition of 112.5 kg.a" - remove the "a" after the period
  • "and failed at 142.5 kg in his third and final attempt;" - try
  • "the silver medal was won by" - taken to avoid close reptition

References

edit
  • Reference 14 has a backslash in the website field that requires its removal

A good amount of effort has been put into this article. Only minor quibbles need to be actioned. MWright96 (talk) 08:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply