This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I plan to expand the stub into a full length Wikipedia article as part of the APS Wikipedia initiative and a graduate level class assignment. -Amylynn0815-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amylynn0815 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dear Amylynn0815, thanks a lot for putting so much content in this article. In general, a lot of it is useful. However, the article, or its history section, does not say much about the motivation for ALG research, nor about the context in language acquisition. Also, many sections read like a paper, not like an encyclopedic article, and sometimes, very specific interpretations are preferred over an exposition of the more general questions. Then, the references do not have any page numbers, and sometimes it is obvious that a given reference cannot support the statement in question. Since you seem to have some expertise and overview over the topic, it would be great if you could improve on these issues. Kind regards, 㓟 (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
