Talk:Armageddon (2007)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Citation for the dark match

edit

Perhaps we've all seen this cited on wrestlezone.com, but its a news site, so we don't want it here. I found this

http://www.zimbio.com/Montel+Vontavious+Porter/articles/3/2007+WWE+Armageddon+Results

and this

http://www.wrestleview.com/news2006/1197878219.shtml - Even says Festus destroyed Morrison...perhaps made the pin, but let's not rush to conclusions.....

Here are some more, take a look and see what's up...

http://wwewrestlingvideos.blogspot.com/2007/12/rey-mysterio-vs-mvp-for-wwe-us-title-at.html http://www.thewrestlinggeek.com/blog1/category/wwe-ppv-results/armageddon/ http://www.wrestlingattitude.com/armageddon.php

I realize a lot of these sources are based around news and forum sites, but its all about the same.--Lord Dagon (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

If Wrestleview is an acceptable source in D2D (a FA) then I believe it's just fine here. You'll never find a WWE.com source for a dark match. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Actually, on a couple of occasions WWE has mentioned the dark match (like the lumberjack match at WrestleMania 23), although I recall them only doing this 2 or 3 times. TJ Spyke 21:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I took the liberty of citing it, if that's okay since you okayed the source and you are as I see it a huge contributor....--Lord Dagon (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think that's fine, but others may disagree. And you overestimate my credentials. I don't do many important things, really. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Information and sources

edit

Why can't people understand that you only write information when it is backed up by a source! 90% of this article isn't unsourced. And the "In Construction" tag is not enough actually, because it still doesn't give anyone the right to write some random information without backing it up with a citation. Feedback 01:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pre-GA review

edit

Well it's pretty obvious that at Report#Aftermath, references are needed. Do this and you're good to go! Limetolime talk to me look what I did! 21:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armageddon (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Armageddon (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply